[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] Production use: 2.0.9 or 2.1?

  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Production use: 2.0.9 or 2.1?
  • From: Tony Molloy <tony.molloy@xxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:57:45 +0100

On Monday 10 September 2007 13:34, Waters, Roger wrote:
> Hi,
> due to the problems of IPsec with NAT we're in the process of
> evaluating the possibility of implementing OpenVPN for our
> road warriors (there are about 50 of them). A first test with
> OpenVPN 2.0.9 running on Debian Etch (tun/net30) looks very
> promising.
> Even though 2.0.9 seems to be running fine, version 2.1 beta
> is out for quite a while now. Escpecially the new topology
> called "subnet" sounds very interesting and it's a lot more
> efficient than the net30 topology.
> Can you already recommend using 2.1 rc for production use or
> would you still suggest using 2.0.9 for now?
> Best regards
> Roger

Well I've been running the 2.1 branch since 2.1-rc1 without any problems. I'm 
currently running 2.1-rc4 with the "topology subnet" enabled and find it very 

OpenVPN mailing lists