[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] 2.0 Feature Freeze Discussion


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] 2.0 Feature Freeze Discussion
  • From: George Ross <gdmr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:32:41 +0000

> If this is ever supported in OpenVPN then it should not be a default
> option and require extra configuration at the server that can't be
> circumvented by the client.

I don't think anybody ever argued otherwise.

> IMHO if you can get what you want by running multiple ports and
> daemons/services then you have what you want without weakening the
> security of OpenVPN.

How is running two daemons any different from setting a configuration-file 
option in this respect?  Both accept exactly the same types of connections,
just in slightly different ways.
-- 
Dr George D M Ross, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
    Kings Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3JZ
Mail: gdmr@xxxxxxxxxxxx   Voice: +44 131 650 5147   Fax: +44 131 667 7209
 PGP: 1024D/AD758CC5  B91E D430 1E0D 5883 EF6A  426C B676 5C2B AD75 8CC5


Attachment: pgpwt5CbGPSp9.pgp
Description: PGP signature