|
|
On Friday 31 August 2007 17:04:09 Siim Põder wrote: > Hi! > > Klaus Thielking-Riechert wrote: > > IMHO the intention has been that you will have an automatic failover for > > the connection of the two Linux boxes running openvpn. > > > > I suggested using a routing protocol as one (of the many!) possible > > solution. The setup might look like this: > > This is a bit of an overkill for two-tunnel failover though, don't you > think? > > The original idea of using ping should be fine (make sure it binds to > the right tunnel interface). You probably don't need to code anything > and can get away with a simple shell script. > > Siim > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-users mailing list > Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users Hi Siim, I think you are right, this is definitively the simplest solution, I just wanted to point out that openvpn can also be clustered with the help of heartbeat, and that port-based-routing over two lines is very handy. Have a nice week! :-) -- Best Regards - Mit freundlichen Gruessen Markus Feilner ______________________ OpenVPN mailing lists https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |