No it isn't (a protocol of VOiP).
It is exactly what you are looking for : "S_imple T_raversal of U_DP through N_ATs"
David
wow, thanks for matt and david's reply.
hmm, stun seem to be a protocol of voip, I am going to try hamachi.
2007/2/8, Matt Richards <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> hum, ok well the only way i can see is to get a 3rd party that runs a
> server that has the ability to forward a single port to a server.
>
> I did look into this a little while ago, I tried to get 32 megs of ram
> and a 200 MHz CPU on a virtual server but I never pushed it.
>
> Maybe somebody you know or maybe you could hire a miniserver that has
> a public IP address to just run a couple of openvpn servers on that
> will allow you to route between or bridge the virtual connections.
>
> Appart from that I cant see anyway of running an openvpn connection
> between two instances that you dont have control over.
>
> hth,
>
> matty.
>
> Quoting darkblue <darkblue2000@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > actually, I have no privilege to access both of the two nat gateways.
> > So, I am afraid I can not do such port forward modification in the
> > home's nat gateway.
> >
> > and, is there any possible?I know it is tough, but I really want to
> > figure out.
> > because there are so much work to do even after I am out of my office.
> >
> > 2007/2/6, Matt Richards <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> darkblue wrote:
> >>> Any possible to do that.
> >>> because My Desktop in corp. and My PC at home are all behind NAT.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> hello,
> >>
> >> yes its possible, you would just have to forward the port that you
> >> intend to use for the server to the computer that is running the daemon
> >> behind the NAT device
> >>
> >> the default port is 1194/udp (i think) so just get your NAT devices at
> >> home to forward this port and connect from the pc at your work place.
> >>
> >> Matty.
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > He is nothing
>
>
>
>
>
--
He is nothing