|
|
wow, thanks for matt and david's reply. hmm, stun seem to be a protocol of voip, I am going to try hamachi. 2007/2/8, Matt Richards <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > hum, ok well the only way i can see is to get a 3rd party that runs a > server that has the ability to forward a single port to a server. > > I did look into this a little while ago, I tried to get 32 megs of ram > and a 200 MHz CPU on a virtual server but I never pushed it. > > Maybe somebody you know or maybe you could hire a miniserver that has > a public IP address to just run a couple of openvpn servers on that > will allow you to route between or bridge the virtual connections. > > Appart from that I cant see anyway of running an openvpn connection > between two instances that you dont have control over. > > hth, > > matty. > > Quoting darkblue <darkblue2000@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > actually, I have no privilege to access both of the two nat gateways. > > So, I am afraid I can not do such port forward modification in the > > home's nat gateway. > > > > and, is there any possible?I know it is tough, but I really want to > > figure out. > > because there are so much work to do even after I am out of my office. > > > > 2007/2/6, Matt Richards <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> darkblue wrote: > >>> Any possible to do that. > >>> because My Desktop in corp. and My PC at home are all behind NAT. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> hello, > >> > >> yes its possible, you would just have to forward the port that you > >> intend to use for the server to the computer that is running the daemon > >> behind the NAT device > >> > >> the default port is 1194/udp (i think) so just get your NAT devices at > >> home to forward this port and connect from the pc at your work place. > >> > >> Matty. > >> > > > > > > -- > > He is nothing > > > > > -- He is nothing ______________________ OpenVPN mailing lists https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |