[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] does linux machine need to accept the virtualnetwork


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] does linux machine need to accept the virtualnetwork
  • From: Wallace Yang <yangres2002@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:36:06 -0500 (EST)

So the virtual private network addresses are
transparent to the linux box, is that correct?  The
linux box only "sees" the physical IP address (without
the need to define any tunneling rules.)  

I can get both vpn server and client to connect, but
they can't ping each other.

Thanks.

Wallace
---------------------------------------------------
If the linux machine is just forwarding packets
between the two VPN 
host,
and it is already working, the not extra settings are
needed for the 
tunneled
packets. They are hidden (encrypted) from it anyway.

________________________________

From: openvpn-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
behalf of Wallace 
Yang
Sent: Thu 01-Feb-07 22:29
To: openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Openvpn-users] does linux machine need to
accept the 
virtualnetwork



Dear openvpn users:

I'm new - new to vpn, and linux, and this is my first
post, so be gentle.  Consider:

There is a winvpn server, a winvpn client, and a linux
machine in between.  The winvpn server and clients are
on the same Lan, with the linux machine being a
firewall to the outside world. 

I've been reading the howto - and there's something
I'm not clear about.  When the virtual network is
created by the server, it shouldn't be a subset or a
superset of the physical network, correct?

Let say the physical is 192.168.1.0/24, and the
virtual is 192.168.2.0/24.

Do I have to accept packets with 192.168.2.0/24
addresses in the forward chain in iptables of the
linux machine?

Thanks in advance
______________________
OpenVPN mailing lists
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users