[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN 2.0.9 and 2.1-beta16 released


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN 2.0.9 and 2.1-beta16 released
  • From: Andrew Richardson <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:23:54 -0400

James Yonan wrote:
> 2006.10.01 -- Version 2.0.9
> 
> * Windows installer updated with OpenSSL 0.9.7l DLLs to fix
>   published vulnerabilities.
> 
> * Fixed TAP-Win32 bug that caused BSOD on Windows Vista
>   (Henry Nestler).  The TAP-Win32 driver has now been
>   upgraded to version 8.4.
> 
> 2006.10.01 -- Version 2.1-beta16
> 
> * Windows installer updated with OpenSSL 0.9.7l DLLs to fix
>   published vulnerabilities.
> 
> * Fixed TAP-Win32 bug that caused BSOD on Windows Vista
>   (Henry Nestler).
> 
> * Autodetect 32/64 bit Windows in installer and install
>   appropriate TAP driver (Mathias Sundman, Hypherion).
> 
> * Fixed bug in loopback self-test introduced
>   in 2.1-beta15 where self test as invoked by
>   "make check" would not properly exit after
>   2 minutes (Paul Howarth).
> 
> James

James, do you have an informal road map for future OpenVPN development?
There have been a number of major enhancements discussed and it's not
clear how they would be brought together, or even if they fit under
OpenVPN vs. a separate project. I'm wondering what your longer-term
plans are for the project.

Andrew
______________________
OpenVPN mailing lists
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users


Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-10/msg00001.html on line 208

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-10/msg00001.html on line 208