Thomas Heidemann wrote:
> Argh!
> Now I see it too! Thanks for this hint.
>
> But isn't this the normal routing when the server stands in a subnet which has to be routed/pushed?
> So everybody should have this problem, right?
I have two interfaces :-) and I believe most people do so.
>
> Ok, I know my problem now but how can I solve it?
> I manually set a host route to the server over my normal eth1 and everything is ok.
Yes
> But I hav e to find asolution where every client (in every possible subnet) can connect to the server.
Push routes accordingly
>
> What's your approach for this? Do I have to put the server in a new subnet or is there any solution with pushing/deleting some routes?
Divide your route in a number of adjacent routes not including the
server itself
something like
145.253.90.32/28
145.253.90.48/32
145.253.90.50/32
145.253.90.51/32
145.253.90.52/30
145.253.90.56/29
It would be easier to move the OpenVPN server away from the middle of
that subnet. That might make less routes.
cheers
Erich
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
|