[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] Push client DNS queries through the tunnel?


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Push client DNS queries through the tunnel?
  • From: "Jed Sheckler" <jedsheckler@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:48:52 +0800



On 9/4/06, Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jed Sheckler wrote:
> If I manually change the
> DNS server for the client's ethernet connection to 192.168.15.1
> <http://192.168.15.1 > it then pushes all DNS queries through the tunnel.
> This obviously won't work for the long term or for many clients,
> however! Any input as to why DNS is not going through the tunnel would
> be much appreciated! Thank you!

Which adapter has higher priority -- ethernet or tap? (Go to Control
Panel/Network Connections/Advanced Settings; priority is in order from
top to bottom)

If ethernet has a higher priority, does moving tap ahead of it cause the
tap adapter's DNS settings to take precedence?



The tap device is at the top of the list.  (Followed by wireless, followed by wired.  Wired being used currently.) 

Funny thing being that DNS queries are showing up at both the client and at the server!? 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-09/msg00022.html on line 181

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-09/msg00022.html on line 181