Re: [Openvpn-users] Traffic in OpenVPN

I am sent my configuration and .gif with my scene.

My configuration server is:

# IP port
local 200.x.y.1
port 1194
proto udp
##dev tun
dev tap0
ca ca.crt
cert server.crt
key server.key
dh dh1024.pem
tls-server
duplicate-cn
mode server
server 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
keepalive 10 120
comp-lzo
max-clients 15
user nobody
group nogroup
persist-key
persist-tun
status      /var/log/openvpn-status.log
log         /var/log/openvpn.log
log-append /var/log/openvpn.log
verb 6
#client-to-client
cipher BF-CBC        # Blowfish (default)
;cipher BF-CBC        # Blowfish (default)
;cipher AES-128-CBC   # AES
;cipher DES-EDE3-CBC # Triple-DES
auth-user-pass-verify ./script.sh via-env

2006/8/5, Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

You're still sending HTML mail with your IP addresses turned into links.
Please turn it off.

Andrew And wrote:
> I am wanting that net 10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24> access
> 200.x.y.0/24, and now I am using routing configuration. But i am
> thinking to use bridging configuration, what do the people think about
> this my scene (routing or bridging configuration)?.

Routing is preferable from a bandwidth/scalability perspective, and so
should be used unless you have a compelling reason to use bridging.

Which range is OpenVPN using for the tun-adapter addresses? If they're
in the 10.0.0.0/24 range, that's a Bad Thing -- you want the IP range
used for the VPN addresses to be clearly distinguishable from that used
from the network on either endpoint. It might be helpful (to better
understand what you're doing presently) if you posted your OpenVPN
server's config file.

Attachment: scene.gif
Description: GIF image

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier

_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users