[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] Traffic in OpenVPN


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Traffic in OpenVPN
  • From: "Andrew And" <andcop2006@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:15:57 -0300

 
 I am wanting that net 10.0.0.0/24 access 200.x.y.0/24, and now I am using routing configuration. But i am thinking to use bridging configuration, what do the people think about this my scene (routing or bridging configuration)?.

 


2006/8/4, Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Please avoid sending HTML mail to the list. Your mailer is making all
the IP addresses in your message into links, and when I reply in
text-only form my mailer tries to expand them.

I think the configuration you're trying to build is... confused. If
10.0.0.0/24 is the address range you're dedicating to your VPN, why are
you assigning addresses in that range to systems' ethernet adapters?

(Is this a bridging or routing configuration? What does your OpenVPN
configuration look like?)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00072.html on line 189

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00072.html on line 189