|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charles Duffy wrote: > Should the systems behind gatewayA and gatewayB be able to access the > servers at 10.2.0.0/24? Should systems on the 10.2.0.0/24 segment be > able to individually address the systems behind gatewayA and gatewayB? Yes, the clients behind the gateways need to access the servers. No, the servers do not need to address clients directly/individually. I've been working on this and I finally got it working, yay! The problem was that I was diverting the VPN traffic and normal NAT traffic through the same natd. Starting a second natd on the VPN interface make it NAT correctly now. Yay! Thanks! Josh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE06G6V/+PyAj2L+IRAmsPAJ9QI4trsz7xfOVf/csX1RMHvWJ1sACfXFcf t4kQYIhWnPq4tfoUapEA1zA= =LOx3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________ OpenVPN mailing lists https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00066.html on line 200 Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00066.html on line 200 |