[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

[Openvpn-users] topology subnet and arp


  • Subject: [Openvpn-users] topology subnet and arp
  • From: Richard Quintin <rjqjunk@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:32:49 -0400

Hi all,

I'm working on moving from a sort of working bridged vpn to a topology 
subnet.  My hope is that it will simplify my life considerably.

# openvpn --version
OpenVPN 2.1_beta14 i686-pc-linux [SSL] [LZO2] [EPOLL] built on Aug  2 2006
Developed by James Yonan
Copyright (C) 2002-2005 OpenVPN Solutions LLC <info@xxxxxxxxxxx>

How do I setup the route/firewall to allow traffic between a vpn client 
and host sitting behind the vpn server.

vpn client (10.8.0.2) <---vpn--->(tun0 - 10.8.0.1) vpn server (eth1 - 
10.82.162.250) <------>(10.82.162.116) host

Client is able to connect fine.  Pings to 10.8.0.1 are fine.
I push all 10.0.0.0/8 through tun0.
10.0.0.0        *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 tun0

So now when I ping 10.82.162.116, the host (10.82.162.116) sees the 
ping, but is unable to respond because no one responds to an arp who-has 
10.8.0.2.

Should the vpn client be responding or should the vpn server be 
responding on behalf of the client?  In either case can someone suggest 
the proper ip/eb/arptables rules to make it so?

Thanks!
-- 
Richard Quintin

~ If tin whistles are made out of tin, what do they make fog horns out of?
______________________
OpenVPN mailing lists
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users


Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00022.html on line 205

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-08/msg00022.html on line 205