|
|
Jon Bendtsen <jon.bendtsen <at> laerdal.dk> writes: > > > > I might try TCP again, but it was the first thing to fail. I'm using > > certificates with persisting key. > > static keys MIGHT recover more quickly, but it is less secure. > And you need one tunnel pr. client. > I'd much rather stick to cert, I was going to implement PAM as well but it didn't work first time, perhaps once this has been fixed I'll do that. So is the conculsion that I should try TCP again and then stick with the fragmented packets and shorter keep-alives? Its just weird that the packets still arrive in Windows, but the virtual adaptor doesn't respond in XP? ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |