[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] Openvpn slow on asymmetric connections


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Openvpn slow on asymmetric connections
  • From: Jon Bendtsen <jon.bendtsen@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:43:01 +0100

Den fredag 6.jan kl. 2:31 skrev George Thompson:

Hi there,
Using the other connection (comcast) slowed it down. Probable becuse my uploaded for it is slower. 1 mbits/s compared to 2mbits/ s I have with Verizon. My downloads outside of the tunnel are fast. I just finished downloading the Slackware 10.2 ISO. The download average outside the tunnel was around 13.2 mbits/s. Inside the tunnel it is still around 1.7 mbits/s. I tried the connection at the university again. Over there I get a little over 10mbits/s though the tunnel, and about the same outside the tunnel.

Did you try with different packet sizes? I would like you to read the manpage and look at: --link-mtu n --tun-mtu n --tun-mtu-extra n --mtu-disc type --mtu-test --fragment max --mssfix max --sndbuf size --rcvbuf size --txqueuelen n


Maybe also: --shaper n --passtos --tcp-queue-limit n



If neither of that works, i have no further ideas, other than to let James take a look at your problem. I think he reads the mailinglist as well. If it is ever solved, i would like to hear the solution.



JonB

____________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users


Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-01/msg00117.html on line 207

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2006-01/msg00117.html on line 207