|
|
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:51:58AM +0200, Mathias Sundman wrote: > I don't know the exact details of this so I'll let someone else like James > comment on this but my first guess is that there is a missunderstanding > somewhere about what sizes that is to be refered. If it is "data payload > size", IP packet size, ethernet frame size and so on. For example when Mathias, Thank you for pointing out that possible source of confusion. To make matters worse, not all ping programs report the same way: many report the ICMP payload size (must add 8 for ICMP header and 20 for IP header to get the IP packet size) but I think Cisco IOS ping reports the total IP packet size. So let me clarify: all sizes I made reference to in my original post were IP packet size, no datalink header. > details by head, I just think there is a logical explaination to what you > are seeing rather than a bug in the software. I agree, that's why I'm hoping to understand OpenVPN a little better. > The only way you can workaround this without going back to the old PtP > mode is setting up "groups" of users that can live with the same MTU > settings and run multiple instances of OpenVPN in server mode on your That's a good idea. Thank you for your quick response. -Phil ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |