|
|
Jason Keltz wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Jason Keltz wrote:
...
In terms of adding routes back to the VPN subnets, that is what I
want to do, but that is where there is a tricky problem...
When an individual client connects to either VPN server, it will get
the exact same IP. This is done so that software (like NFS) will be
able to basically handle a client moving from one VPN to the other if
>> a VPN server goes down...
Hi Erich,
You didn't say whether you are aware of any way to route back to the two
VPN hosts other than the source NAT that I described. Even if I don't
use this for NFS failover, dealing with one set of addresses rather than
two will be helpful.
Oh, I am sorry. Using two distinct address pools makes routing childs
play. Just add both routes. The only thing you will be missing is
seamless hand over. If it is a prerequisite, then this probably won't work.
Erich
____________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
|