|
|
Leonard Isham wrote: > > Looks like it picked up some routes for the 10.8.0.0 network. Why > > would it have separate entries for 4 different IP addresses on that network? > > Are you using RIP, OSPF or any other dynamic routing protocols? I didn't think so. Routed on this system supports RIP, but I don't see routed running. But I can't come up with any other explanation for those routes... > > I wonder if I should get rid of those PPP adapters that I set up ages > > ago to try to use for remote access... > > > > I would. Done. They're gone now. No difference in the pinging. > > > Can you "swap out" the firewall for an iptables firewall that only > > > allows OpenVPN for testing and move back to your original firewall? > > > > Not sure what you mean by this - get rid of IPCop for something else? > > I'd rather not do that if possible. BTW, IPCop has been IPTables > > based since version 1.3 - I'm on 1.4.2. > > I mean remove it from the equation use IP tables on a spare > system or just use it on the OpenVPN server in place of your > real firewall for a test. I don't know if that is an option for you. Well, this firewall is in production use, supporting about 35 people, with a bunch of port-forwarding rules & other stuff, so I'd rather not mess with it if I can help it. > P.S. You missed the list on this e-mail. Drat! I keep trying to remember to change that, but it slipped past me that time. Most of the mailing lists I'm on default back to the list address as the Reply-to:. I'm going to set up tcpdumps as mentioned in your other message which I just received. Then I'll try some pings back & forth & see what I can see. Please let me know if there is anything else I should try. Thanks for all of your help! Brian Leyton IT Manager Commercial Petroleum Equipment ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |