[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

[Openvpn-users] Multiple Site Examples?


  • Subject: [Openvpn-users] Multiple Site Examples?
  • From: "Brian Buchanan" <brianbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:39:56 -0500
  • Importance: Normal

I have been able to get point to point (unencrypted) routing tunnels working
well with 2.0rc12.

I would like some help in understanding how to proceed with a multiple-site
star solution.

Is this something that is done with a single config and a single instance of
OpenVPN (at the hub), or would I create multiple configs and run OpenVPN
multiple times?

My current configs look much like this (so you have an idea where I'm coming
from):

(Hub site - 10.1.0.0/16 network)
remote 44.33.22.11
port 5000
dev tun
ifconfig 10.11.0.2 10.11.0.1

and the opposite in the spoke
(spoke site - 10.4.0.0/16 network)
remote 11.22.33.44
port 5000
dev tun
ifconfig 10.11.0.1 10.11.0.2

And then I manually add the routes at each end.

On the hub machine (running Windows 2000 Pro)
route add 10.4.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 10.11.0.1

On the spoke machine (running Slackware 10)
route add -net 10.1.0.0/16 gw 10.11.0.2

Basically at this point I want to add 10.2.0.0/16, and 10.3.0.0/16 to the
mix but I'm unclear if I do this with a single config file, or multiple
configs.

Thanks for any help.

Brian



____________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users


Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2005-02/msg00198.html on line 219

Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2005-02/msg00198.html on line 219