|
|
Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx <at> luusa.org> writes: > > Hi, [SNIP] > > Okay, I talked today to Angelo and we agreed to only support > OpenVPN 2.0, because of the advanced features. > I updated the README file for the next release. > > > Since I insist on using a bridged VPN (I want broadcasted services), and > > I already have managed the many confs/ports pairs I need for my tunnels > > (cf. the conf split between generic main.conf and overriding me.confs), > > I don't really feel like going to OpenVPN 2.0 will help me. I am mostly > > unaware of OpenVPN 2.0. Would you recommend using Ovpn 2.0 for a > > bridged VPN ? > > Yes, why not? > Do you have patched 1.6 to get the TAP device working? > TAP support for MaxOS X is added in openvpn beta 17... > My server is a 1.6 debian linux box. The tap device on the mac works perfectly with openvpn 1.6 I don't remember I have patched anything. Just use the newest tap device from http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~nissler/tuntap/ Allright. Debian has openvpn in testing/unstable only, and has decided to move to 2.0. I updated recklessly and my now tls-auth script is wacked. Oh well. I guess I am going to scratch my 1.x setup and learn how to use 2.0. See you later. ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |