|
|
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 05:36:20PM +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote: > > > > what would the benefit be? is libz faster than lzo? does it compress > > any better? > > is it supported on as many platforms ? > > > > It is in source, so it can compile on many platforms. But, > it is an ugly **HACK** right now, because I want to achieve > higher compression ratio, I can't wait for someone to write it > for me. > > The documents I read is that libz compresses better. Exactly > how much better I am hoping that the users can share with me. In any case, and once it's nicely incorporated and not an 'ugly hack', ;) it's great news! Having multiple choices is always nice. -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | BOFH excuse #363: agi@(agi.as|debian.org) | Out of cards on drive D: Encrypted mail preferred | Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9 0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3 ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2004-06/msg00080.html on line 201 Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2004-06/msg00080.html on line 201 |