|
|
Does anyone have a recommendation on a good Sendmail book? Thanks. ==================================================== Chris Baker -- technical specialist 614-839-2447x108 cbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.bbbscentralohio.org Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio Opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely my own. The document(s) accompanying or within this email transmission may contain confidential information belonging to Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, which is legally privileged for the entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby cautioned that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this email information is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify us immediately by fax (614-839-5437) or phone (614-839-2447) to advise of the error. -----Original Message----- From: openvpn-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openvpn-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Locke Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:06 PM To: Doug Lytle Cc: openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Multiple Windows clients to a Linux server On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 10:51, Doug Lytle wrote: > I don't know, I set out to route. > > I've gotten a couple complaints of how this wastes address space, so > I've talked to our network administrator and asked if there was a way to > reduce the waste of the address space. He said I could use a > 255.255.255.252 subnet mask: > I did this for the tun devices I set up. In the docs, it says that Windows tun devices must use a subnet with a 255.255.255.252 subnet, using the middle pair of addresses. Haven't tested this from Windows, though. I used a private VPN address space of 10.192.0.0/30 for these devices, because it seems almost all of the home broadband devices use a 192.168.* subnet, and I thought I would completely eliminate a chance of conflicts by using something away from that. Of course, if you use a 10.0.0.0/8 private network, this won't work... For assigning the actual addresses, this level of subnet made for an easy formula for determining the correct IP address: - for the server side, take the tun device number, multiply by 4, and add 1. tun0 = 10.192.0.1, tun1 = 10.192.0.5, tun2 = 10.192.0.9, etc. - for the client side, take the tun device number, multiply by 4, and add 2. remote connection for tun0 = 10.192.0.2, tun1 = 10.192.0.6, tun2 = 10.192.0.10. Add a return route to the main router, directing 10.192.0.0/24 to the openvpn gateway, and you're in business. Is there an advantage to using tap devices in a routed configuration? -- John Locke Open Source solutions for small business problems http://freelock.com ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |