|
|
Hi all, I tried to find information on the web on how to do this without any luck. I was wondering whether anyone in this list could help me. Here's what I am trying to do. I have a Windows Server 2003 machine X in my organisation's network with only one net interface (x.x.x.x). X is part of the active directory (AD) and although I have admin rights to it, I don't have admin rights to AD. I can establish a VPN connection with X from my laptop Y. I use tun and the IP addresses (X: 192.168.0.1, Y: 192.168.0.2). The gateway from laptop changes, depending on which network (outside my organisation) I connect to. Let's assume that the gateway address is g.g.g.g. What I want to do is to make my laptop part of my organisation's network. It should have been easy but I must be doing something wrong. I can establish the OpenVPN connection without a problem and I can ping 192.168.0.1 from my laptop. Then, I add the following routes on my laptop (running WindowsXP). route add x.x.x.x mask 255.255.255.255 g.g.g.g route add x.x.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.2 Then, on my Windows Server 2003 machine, X, I want to hide the use of the 192.168.0.0 private network. Initially, I enabled Internet Connection Sharing, which does NAT, on the physical interface (the one with IP x.x.x.x) but that didn't work so I disabled it. Then, I tried to enable the Remote Access and Routing service and configure NAT manually but that doesn't work either. I must be doing something wrong at this stage, so any pointers to information about how I could do this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks in advance, .savas. Warning: require_once(../../../archive_common.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2003-12/msg00029.html on line 191 Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required '../../../archive_common.php' (include_path='/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/openvpn/domains/openvpn.net/public_html/archive/openvpn-users/2003-12/msg00029.html on line 191 |