[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

Re: [Openvpn-users] Could openvpn control the conflict network?


  • Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Could openvpn control the conflict network?
  • From: "oyk" <oyk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:52:19 +0800

Hi,John Conneely

192.168.201.2 --192.168.201.0/24-- |192.168.201.1 10.1.0.232| --10.1.0.0/24--|10.1.0.178 192.168.200.1| --192.168.200/24-- 192.168.200.10
 home client                            home nat firewall                         Office FW                               one of office server
   I have solute that problem, Now, I can setup the connection between the 192.168.201.2 box and the 10.1.0.178 box,
   I do not know why the 'home.up' does not work. I cp the 'home.up' from 'sample-config-files" again, and modified 
it, it is ok. It is strange....

   Now, I use the 'ssldump' tool to capture the package between the openvpn client and server, but it could not get any information.
#ssldump host 192.168.201.2 and 10.1.0.178
(nothing)
#ssldump host 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.1
(nothing)
I run 'ssldump' on my client box, if I setup the openvpn client on the home nat firewall, I run the 'ssldump' on 10.1.0.232,
the result is the same....
I can use 'ssldump' capture the ssl info without tunnel....
It is the problem of 'ssldump', it could not capture the tunnel form?
Or it is the openvpn problem, after the openvpn setup tunnel by ssl/tls model, it use plaintext data to transmit?

Best Regards
   Ouyang Kai




____________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users